· 2/6/1951
Kropa v. Robie
Citations
- 187 F.2d 150
- 38 C.C.P.A. 858
- 88 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 478
- 1951 CCPA LEXIS 296
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a preamble is limiting when it is “necessary to give life, meaning and vitality to the claims or counts”
- stating that a preamble is limiting when it is “necessary to give life, meaning and vitality to the claims or counts”
- finding that the preamble is not a limitation where the claim language apart from the preamble properly defines the invention
- noting that preamble sets out distinct relationship among remaining claim elements
- stating the rule that a preamble is treated as a limitation if it gives “life and meaning” to the claim
- Stating the preamble does not limit the claims unless it is “necessary to give life meaning and vitality” to the claims.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garrett, Jackson, O'Connell, Johnson, Worley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.