Skip to main content
· 2/6/1951

Kropa v. Robie

Citations

  • 187 F.2d 150
  • 38 C.C.P.A. 858
  • 88 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 478
  • 1951 CCPA LEXIS 296

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a preamble is limiting when it is “necessary to give life, meaning and vitality to the claims or counts”
  • stating that a preamble is limiting when it is “necessary to give life, meaning and vitality to the claims or counts”
  • finding that the preamble is not a limitation where the claim language apart from the preamble properly defines the invention
  • noting that preamble sets out distinct relationship among remaining claim elements
  • stating the rule that a preamble is treated as a limitation if it gives “life and meaning” to the claim
  • Stating the preamble does not limit the claims unless it is “necessary to give life meaning and vitality” to the claims.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garrett, Jackson, O'Connell, Johnson, Worley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.