In Re Hacot-Colombier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The regulation’s term ‘substantially’ permits some inconsequential variation from the ‘exact representation’ standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• On-Line Careline, Inc. v. America Online, Inc., (Substituted for Compuserve, Inc.)
  Federal Circuit· 2000-10-10· cited 121×
• In Re Thrifty, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-12-13· cited 22×
• CTB, Inc.
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 1999-08-31
• Royal BodyCare, Inc.
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2007-02-22
• wTe Corporation
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2008-05-13
• Yale Sportswear Corporation
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2008-07-03
• Guitar Straps Online, LLC
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2012-08-09
• Calphalon Corporation
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2017-03-20
• Lee Greenwood
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2020-12-01
• MN Apparel LLC
  Trademark Trial and Appeal Board· 2021-05-14

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
• Weiss Associates, Inc. v. Hrl Associates, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1990-05-10· cited 55×
• Stock Pot Restaurant, Inc. v. Stockpot, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1984-07-09· cited 53×
• Eastman Kodak Company v. Bell & Howell Document Management Products Company
  Federal Circuit· 1993-06-02· cited 43×
• In Re Dr Pepper Company
  Federal Circuit· 1987-12-24· cited 27×
• In Re ECCS, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-09-06· cited 15×
• International Mobile MacHines Corporation v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 1986-09-15· cited 7×