Eastman Kodak Company v. Bell & Howell Document Management Products Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• giving Chevron deference to the TTAB’s interpretation of the Lanham Act
• giving Chevron deference to the TTAB’s interpretation of the Lanham Act
• The “challenger's burden of proof in both opposition and cancellation proceedings is a preponderance of the evidence”
• “[T]he challenger's burden of proof in both opposition and cancellation proceedings is a preponderance of the evidence”
• “[T]he challenger’s burden of proof in both opposition and cancellation proceedings is a preponderance of the evi- dence.”
• party challenging mark on descriptiveness grounds may establish standing by pleading and proving it is engaged in manufacture or sale of related products

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).