Stock Pot Restaurant, Inc. v. Stockpot, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• after discussing clear error, upholding the Board’s “finding” of “sufficient control” as supported by “adequate evidence”
• defendant exercised sufficient control over the use of its mark through the provisions of a lease
• defendant exercised sufficient control over the use of its mark through the provisions of a lease
• “There is no question that the marks of the parties [STOCKPOT AND STOCK POT] are confusingly similar. The word marks are phonetically identical and visually almost identical.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).