In Re Goude

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing case because plan could not be modified since the 60-month period had expired and plan could not be extended to include payment of priority tax claims
• \There is no reason to attach a different meaning to the completion of payments required in § 1328(a) from the same requirement in § 1329(a).\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roberts v. Boyajian (In Re Roberts)
  First Circuit· 2002-02-08· cited 21×
• Marshall v. Henry (In Re Henry)
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-02-13· cited 12×
• In Re Grant
  N.D. Illinois· 2010-05-24· cited 8×
• Shovlin v. Klaas
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-08-28· cited 8×
• In Re Kincaid
  E.D. California· 2004-10-08· cited 4×
• Shovlin v. Klaas (In re Klaas)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-03-01· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Matter of Evelyn G. Escobedo, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-06-22· cited 59×
• In Re Phelps
  N.D. Illinois· 1993-01-13· cited 43×
• In Re Rivera
  C.D. California· 1995-01-31· cited 16×
• In Re McKinney
  D. Oregon· 1996-02-02· cited 15×
• Matter of Carr
  D. Nebraska· 1993-09-14· cited 12×