In Re Grant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 20 failing to complete plan payments within five years, and where the 21 plan cannot be modified to make completion feasible, constitutes a 22 material default for purposes of § 1307(c)(6); the court also 23 interpreted § 1322(d
• holding that § 1322(d) limits chapter 13 plans to five years, and because the debtor did not pay the proposed 4.5% to unsecured creditors, and did not take advantage of modifying her plan under § 1329, the case was dismissed under § 1307

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re: Steven Patrick Schlegel Joanne Marie Schlegel
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-02-25· cited 29×
• In re Hutchens
  M.D. Florida· 2012-10-04· cited 13×
• In re Cripps
  W.D. Michigan· 2016-05-13· cited 9×
• In re Fishel
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2018-03-30· cited 7×
• Shovlin v. Klaas (In re Klaas)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-03-01· cited 2×
• In re Brian T.
  E.D. New York· 2017-08-14· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Matter Of: Warren C. Chappell and Barbara A. Chappell, Doing Business as Mister Photographer, Debtors, Appeal Of: Homebanc, Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 1993-01-14· cited 99×
• In Re Woodall
  E.D. Arkansas· 1987-01-22· cited 26×
• In Re White
  N.D. Illinois· 1991-04-16· cited 20×
• Marshall v. Henry (In Re Henry)
  N.D. Illinois· 2007-02-13· cited 12×
• In Re Goude
  D. Oregon· 1996-09-23· cited 9×
• In Re Brown
  N.D. California· 2003-07-29· cited 9×
• In Re Jackson
  M.D. Alabama· 1995-04-11· cited 8×
• In Re Henry
  N.D. Illinois· 2006-06-12· cited 5×