In the Matter of Evelyn G. Escobedo, Debtor-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the requirements of § 1322(a)(2) are mandatory” and “cannot be absent from a confirmable Chapter 13 plan”
• holding that a plan under Chapter 13, although confirmed, was invalid because it failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of 11 U.S.C. No. 08-3061 Shaw v. Aurgroup Financial Credit Union, et al. Page 10 § 1322(a)(2) requiring full payment of all claims entitled to priority
• plan failed to comply with § 1325(a)(1) where it “failed to account for the full payment of all priority claims as required under § 1322(a)(2).”
• failure to comply with Bankruptcy Code renders plan nugatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).