In Re Garner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “an inventor’s testimony as to the facts of invention must be corroborated by independent evidence,” such as testimony other than by the inventor or evidence of facts independent of information received from the inventor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-06-16· cited 108×
• Midwestern Pet Foods, Inc. v. Societe Des Produits Nestle S.A.
  Federal Circuit· 2012-07-09· cited 30×
• In Re Lovin
  Federal Circuit· 2011-07-22· cited 16×
• Yorkey v. Diab
  Federal Circuit· 2010-04-07· cited 3×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dickinson v. Zurko
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 997×
• In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. Norton
  Federal Circuit· 2000-02-15· cited 665×
• Richard C. Price v. Dale R. Symsek
  Federal Circuit· 1993-03-11· cited 284×
• Peter B. Cooper v. David Goldfarb
  Federal Circuit· 1998-09-01· cited 138×
• Star Fruits s.n.c. v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2005-01-03· cited 75×
• Dethmers Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Automatic Equipment Mfg Co., Defendant/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 2001-12-05· cited 52×
• Hahn v. Wong
  Federal Circuit· 1989-12-28· cited 41×
• In Re Jeffrey M. Sullivan and Daniel Anthony Gately
  Federal Circuit· 2004-03-22· cited 35×
• Reese v. Hurst
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1981-10-15· cited 34×
• John M. Taskett v. Dale H. Dentlinger
  Federal Circuit· 2003-09-26· cited 12×