Skip to main content
· 3/22/2004

In Re Jeffrey M. Sullivan and Daniel Anthony Gately

Citations

  • 362 F.3d 1324
  • 70 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1145
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5321
  • 2004 WL 547936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • first citing Auer , 519 U.S. at 461-62 , 117 S.Ct. 905 ; then citing Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. , 325 U.S. 410 , 414, 65 S.Ct. 1215 , 89 L.Ed. 1700 (1945) (internal quotations omitted)
  • affirming the use of the Standing Order
  • substantial evidence review of factual findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Linn, Archer, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.