Skip to main content
· 12/21/1964

People v. Fairfax Family Fund, Inc.

Citations

  • 235 Cal. App. 2d 881
  • 47 Cal. Rptr. 812
  • 1964 Cal. App. LEXIS 768

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To argue that defendant is not doing business in California, but engaged only in interstate commerce is to completely ignore the facts of life and reality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fourt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.