Matter of Seaman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a judge’s infringement of an important public policy is grounds for aggravation
• holding that a judge's infringement of an important public policy is grounds for aggravation
• stressing that the sexual harassment by a judge directed to his law clerk was especially egregious because of the judge's authority and superior position
• stressing that the sexual harassment by a judge directed to his law clerk was especially egregious because of the judge’s authority and superior position
• holding 60-day suspension without pay was appropriate sanction for judge who sexually harassed judicial clerk for a prolonged period of time
• stressing that the sexual harassment by a judge directed to his law clerk was especially egregious because of the judge’s authority and superior position

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).