In Re Enron Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that retroactive effect of rejection of electricity purchase agreement yielded a $0 damages claim even though postpetition movements in energy markets imposed substantial losses on the counterparty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant v. Enron Corp. (In Re Enron Corp.)
  S.D. New York· 2006-08-23· cited 6×
• A & K Endowment, Inc. v. General Growth Properties, Inc. (In Re General Growth Properties, Inc.)
  S.D. New York· 2010-02-16· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
• Sexton v. Dreyfus
  Supreme Court· 1911-01-23· cited 224×
• In Re Lavigne
  Second Circuit· 1997-06-02· cited 106×
• In the Matter of Brints Cotton Marketing, Inc., Debtor. Mike Addison v. David R. Langston, Trustee
  Fifth Circuit· 1984-08-06· cited 74×
• Theatre Holding Corp., Debtor-Appellant v. Marcella Pincus Mauro, John E. Mauro and Paul Mauro, Landlords-Appellees
  Second Circuit· 1982-06-01· cited 61×
• In Re Enron Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2002-06-28· cited 17×
• In Re: American Homepatient, Inc., Debtors. Bank of Montreal, for Itself and as Agent for Aimco Cdo Series 2000-A v. American Homepatient, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-07-11· cited 14×