In Re Enron Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the definition of a reasonable time should be interpreted in conjunction with the broad rehabilitative purpose of chapter 11”
• “The ‘option’ to use the property that is inherent in mere possession is considered not sufficient to establish benefit to the estate if the debtor does not actually use the property.”
• “The claimant has the burden of establishing entitlement to the priority”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Hackney
  N.D. Alabama· 2006-09-28· cited 14×
• In Re Hernandez
  D. Arizona· 2002-12-23· cited 11×
• In Re Enron Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2003-10-21· cited 11×
• In Re AppliedTheory Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2004-07-14· cited 8×
• Zions Credit Corp. v. Rebel Rents, Inc. (In Re Rebel Rents, Inc.)
  C.D. California· 2003-03-14· cited 8×
• In Re Kmart Corp.
  N.D. Illinois· 2003-05-28· cited 6×
• Helen-May Holdings, LLC v. Geltzer
  S.D. New York· 2011-08-02· cited 6×
• In Re WorldCom, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2004-04-27· cited 5×
• In Re Atlanta Retail, Inc.
  N.D. Georgia· 2002-12-17· cited 3×
• In Re Stembridge
  N.D. Texas· 2002-12-09· cited 3×
• In Re Adelphia Communications Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2003-03-31· cited 3×
• In Re Enron Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2005-09-21· cited 3×
• In re Grubb & Ellis Co.
  S.D. New York· 2012-10-02· cited 3×
• In Re Dana Corp.
  S.D. New York· 2006-08-28· cited 2×
• In re Hawker Beechcraft, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 2012-12-07· cited 1×