Skip to main content

In re E.H.

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 470

Syllabus

CUSTODY MODIFICATION – JUVENILE – R.C. 3109.04 – GUARDIAN AD LITEM – EVIDENCE The trial court's failure to recite the legal standard of R.C. 3109.04(E)(1) in modifying a prior custody decree did not rise to the level of plain error where no manifest injustice occurred and nothing in the record suggested that the outcome of the proceedings would have differed.The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying mother's motion to discharge the guardian ad litem and strike the guardian ad litem's testimony and report from the record where the guardian ad litem sufficiently discharged her duties.The trial court did not err in finding that mother denied father's parenting time where the court's finding was supported by competent, credible evidence.

Judges: Bergeron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.