In re E.H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the appellant had not preserved his Confrontation Clause complaint on appeal because the appellant did not object on Confrontation Clause grounds when seeking admission of certain evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Alberto Pena v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2019-03-27
• Jose Martinez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2019-08-30
• Isaias Paredes v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 2020-03-31
• Jose Lopez Jr. v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2022-10-27

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crawford v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• Mosley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-01· cited 2,969×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-10-29· cited 801×
• Reyna v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-06-29· cited 776×
• Hammer v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2009-04-08· cited 593×
• Paredes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-01-14· cited 582×
• Davis v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-16· cited 441×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-03-09· cited 100×
• Demarkous Clay v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-02-16· cited 95×
• Hale v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2004-05-20· cited 49×
• Garza v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2000-04-06· cited 45×
• Robinson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2010-04-01· cited 31×
• Matz v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1999-03-25· cited 23×
• Holt v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1996-02-07· cited 14×