Illinois Supreme Court· 10/17/1991

In Re Doyle

Citations

581 N.E.2d 669
144 Ill. 2d 451
163 Ill. Dec. 515
1991 Ill. LEXIS 96

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that although a contingent fee agreement may be valid at the time of its formation, court still has a duty to safeguard the public from the collection of an excessive fee
explaining that although a contingent fee agreement may be valid at the time of its formation, court still has a duty to safeguard the public from the collection of an excessive fee
applying the predecessor to Rule 1.5 to determine if a contingent fee was excessive
applying the predecessor to Rule 1.5 to determine if a contingent fee was excessive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas J. Moran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.