Illinois Supreme Court· 11/22/1995
In Re Smith
Citations
- 659 N.E.2d 896
- 168 Ill. 2d 269
- 213 Ill. Dec. 550
- 1995 Ill. LEXIS 208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- pursuant to Rule 1.4(a) of the Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct, attorneys have an ethical obligation to keep clients informed and apprised of the status of their cases
- lawyer was not disciplined for accepting advanced retainer or for commingling funds but for not promptly returning the unearned portion of retainer
- lawyer disciplined for failing to promptly return unearned portion of prepaid legal fee
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMORROW
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- DeLuna v. BurciagaIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 453×
- Susan Ball v. Cherie KotterSeventh Circuit· 2013-07-23· cited 121×
- In Re Marriage of EberhardtAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-12-12· cited 37×
- In Re HowardIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-12-02· cited 17×
- In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-01-23· cited 17×
- In Re Production Associates, Ltd.N.D. Illinois· 2001-07-11· cited 16×
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-07-23· cited 15×
- Callis, Papa, Jensen, Jackstadt & Halloran, PC v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-10-29· cited 15×
- In Re EckbergIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-07-06· cited 11×
- In re HusainN.D. Illinois· 2015-07-09· cited 9×
- Disciplinary Board v. HoffmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2013-07-23· cited 7×
- In re EdmondsIllinois Supreme Court· 2014-12-29· cited 6×
- In re MaldonadoN.D. Illinois· 2012-11-13· cited 6×
- In Re TwoheyIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-03-23· cited 5×
- In Re IngersollIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-03-18· cited 4×
- In Re DaughertySupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-03-28· cited 4×
- Callis, Papa, Jensen, Jackstadt & Halloran, P.C. v. Norfolk Southern Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-10-29
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 994×
- Rhoades v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-10-19· cited 127×
- In Re HopperIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 79×
- In Re TaylorIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 57×
- In Re AndrosIllinois Supreme Court· 1976-10-01· cited 57×
- In Re DoyleIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 48×
- In Re ZisookIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-12-04· cited 31×
- In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-09-23· cited 28×
- In Re LevinIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-04-04· cited 26×
- In Re BeattyIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-12-21· cited 25×
- In Re UshijimaIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-11-23· cited 24×
- In Re MarchIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 23×
- In Re FoxIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-04-25· cited 22×
- People ex rel. Healy v. CaseIllinois Supreme Court· 1909-10-26· cited 20×
- In Re BlankIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-11-27· cited 19×
- People v. BuckleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-12-29· cited 16×
- In Re SamuelsIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-02-02· cited 16×
- Robert Burton and Curtis B. Clark, Co-Partners, D/B/A Insco v. Hitachi America, Ltd., a New York CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1974-10-18· cited 11×
- Simon v. AulerAppellate Court of Illinois· 1987-05-21· cited 10×
- In Re BettsIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-10-03· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.