Skip to main content

In Re Chandler

Citations

  • 641 N.E.2d 473
  • 161 Ill. 2d 459
  • 204 Ill. Dec. 249
  • 1994 Ill. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a continuing duty on every bar applicant to immediately disclose information relevant to the applicant’s character and fitness as it becomes available
  • stating, “Generally, an attorney may not be disciplined for instances of uncharged misconduct; to do so would violate the respondent’s right to procedural due process and our own notions of candor and fairness.”
  • attorney may not be disciplined for instances of uncharged misconduct because to do so would violate due process rights
  • attorney may not be disciplined for instances of uncharged misconduct because to do so would violate due process rights
  • three-year suspension imposed on an attorney who failed to disclose on her bar application that she provided false information on a mortgage loan application, as well as misstated her social security number in her bar application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, McMorrow, Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.