Illinois Supreme Court· 8/4/1994
In Re Chandler
Citations
- 641 N.E.2d 473
- 161 Ill. 2d 459
- 204 Ill. Dec. 249
- 1994 Ill. LEXIS 108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a continuing duty on every bar applicant to immediately disclose information relevant to the applicant’s character and fitness as it becomes available
- stating, “Generally, an attorney may not be disciplined for instances of uncharged misconduct; to do so would violate the respondent’s right to procedural due process and our own notions of candor and fairness.”
- attorney may not be disciplined for instances of uncharged misconduct because to do so would violate due process rights
- attorney may not be disciplined for instances of uncharged misconduct because to do so would violate due process rights
- three-year suspension imposed on an attorney who failed to disclose on her bar application that she provided false information on a mortgage loan application, as well as misstated her social security number in her bar application
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Miller, McMorrow, Freeman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re StormentIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-11-21· cited 34×
- In re KaravidasIllinois Supreme Court· 2013-12-23· cited 19×
- In Re HowardIllinois Supreme Court· 1999-12-02· cited 17×
- In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-01-23· cited 17×
- In Re QuiatSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-04-26· cited 15×
- In Re StampsSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2004-04-14· cited 12×
- In Re EckbergIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-07-06· cited 11×
- Paul M. Brock v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2013-02-26· cited 11×
- In Re TwoheyIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-03-23· cited 5×
- Richard F. Mallen & Associates, Ltd. v. Myinjuryclaim.com Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-04-18· cited 5×
- In Re DaughertySupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-03-28· cited 4×
- Matter of EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-08-04· cited 2×
- In re MikusNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2006-03-28· cited 2×
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 994×
- In Re HopperIllinois Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 79×
- In Re SaladinoIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 77×
- In Re MitanIllinois Supreme Court· 1979-01-12· cited 63×
- In Re DoyleIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 48×
- In Re CheronisIllinois Supreme Court· 1986-12-19· cited 39×
- In Re JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-12-21· cited 35×
- In Re WittIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-11-21· cited 34×
- In Re CorboyIllinois Supreme Court· 1988-06-20· cited 33×
- In Re LamberisIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-12-17· cited 31×
- In Re TimponeIllinois Supreme Court· 1993-09-23· cited 28×
- In Re RosinIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-12-01· cited 27×
- In Re LevinIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-04-04· cited 26×
- In Re AlschulerIllinois Supreme Court· 1944-11-22· cited 26×
- In Re UshijimaIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-11-23· cited 24×
- In Re LenzIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-10-18· cited 24×
- In Re ArmentroutIllinois Supreme Court· 1983-12-16· cited 22×
- In Re AscherIllinois Supreme Court· 1980-05-22· cited 21×
- In Re McCallumIllinois Supreme Court· 1945-03-21· cited 20×
- In Re RosenthalIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-10-06· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.