Skip to main content

Citations

  • 22 S.W.3d 601
  • 2000 WL 719542

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding litigation exception to physician-patient privilege inapplicable because plaintiff’s claim of negligence, including request for mental-anguish damages, did not allege “severe emotional condition” to place mental condition at issue
  • denying mental examination, in part, because Doe “has not designated any psychiatrist or psychologist as an expert witness”
  • distinguishing between emotional distress accompanying personal injury and mental condition warranting psychological evaluation
  • rejecting defense’s contention that without rape victim’s mental health records, jury would be left with impression that victim was in perfect emotional health before incident and would seek to blame defendant for all of her emotional troubles
  • rejecting defense’s contention that without rape victim’s mental health records, jury would be left with impression that victim was in perfect emotional health before incident and would seek to blame defendant for all of her emotional troubles
  • rejecting defense = s contention that without rape victim = s mental health records, jury would be left with impression that victim was in perfect emotional health before incident and would seek to blame defendant for all of her emotional troubles

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aboussie, Kidd, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.