Skip to main content
Texas Supreme Court· 12/22/1994

R.K. v. Ramirez

Citations

  • 887 S.W.2d 836
  • 1994 WL 601839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that even where, in limited circumstances, medical and mental health privileges yield to discovery, certain other information in documents “remains privileged and must be redacted or otherwise protected”
  • holding that even where, in limited circumstances, medical and mental health privileges yield to discovery, certain other information in documents “remains privileged and must be redacted or otherwise protected”
  • holding that even where, in limited circumstances, medical and mental health privileges yield to discovery, certain other information in documents A remains privileged and must be redacted or otherwise protected @
  • applying the more expansive \part\ of a claim or defense requirement of Tex. R. Evid. 509(d)
  • applying the more expansive \part\ of a claim or defense requirement of Tex. R. Evid. 509(d)
  • requiring “the request for records and the records disclosed are closely related in time and scope to the claims made to avoid any unnecessary incursion into private affairs”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gonzalez, Enoch, Phillips, Hightower, Hecht, Cornyn, Gammage, Spector, Doggett, Court'S

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

91 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named R.K. v. Ramirez

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.