District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2/15/2007
In re D.H.
Citations
- 917 A.2d 112
- 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 85
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding that third factor weighed in favor of waiving birth parents’ rights, even though it was undisputed that children loved their birth parents, and even where relationship between children and birth parents “improved”
- trial court did not abuse its discretion in holding that third factor weighed in favor of waiving birth parents' rights, even though it was undisputed that children loved their birth parents, and even where relationship between children and birth parents \improved\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackburne, Fisher, Rigsby, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re: Petition of S.L.G. & S.E.G. D.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-03-05· cited 26×
- In re: Petition of J.J. T.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-03-26· cited 16×
- In re S.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-12-10· cited 14×
- In re C.L.O.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-04-12· cited 11×
- In re Petition of T.W.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-04-28· cited 8×
- IN RE: PETITION OF G.A.P.R.S.,Appellant.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-03-17· cited 7×
- In re W.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-28· cited 7×
- In Re Petition of WdDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-28
- In Re SMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-12-10
- In Re DHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-02-15
- In Re TWMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-04-28
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Williams v. GerstenfeldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-09-10· cited 67×
- Cruz-Foster v. FosterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-17· cited 51×
- Hill v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-06-28· cited 27×
- In re J.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-09-18· cited 27×
- In re S.C.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-02-02· cited 25×
- In re P.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-12-11· cited 24×
- In re T.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-04-06· cited 20×
- In re I.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-09-30· cited 20×
- In re J.D.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-05-14· cited 18×
- In re J.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-05-19· cited 17×
- In re W.E.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-03-14· cited 16×
- In re Petition of H.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-07-22· cited 9×
- In re D.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-03-28· cited 8×
- In re S.J.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-05-03· cited 7×
- Cianela v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-05-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.