District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/18/2003
In re J.G.
Citations
- 831 A.2d 992
- 2003 D.C. App. LEXIS 558
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \parent's rights may and must be overridden when such a drastic measure is necessary in order to protect the best interests of the child\
- same regarding evidence of child’s full integration into stable pre-adoptive home
- same regarding evidence of child's full integration into stable pre-adoptive home
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farrell, Schwelb, Wagner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re: Petition of S.L.G. & S.E.G. D.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-03-05· cited 26×
- In re J.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-05-19· cited 17×
- In re: Petition of J.J. T.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-03-26· cited 16×
- In re D.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-20· cited 16×
- In re S.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-12-10· cited 14×
- In re F.W. & D.T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-03-17· cited 11×
- In re D.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-02-15· cited 11×
- In re C.L.O.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-04-12· cited 11×
- In re A.C.G.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-03-16· cited 10×
- In re Petition of H.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-07-22· cited 9×
- In re W.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-28· cited 7×
- In re R.E.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-05-19· cited 6×
- In re J.T.B.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-03-26· cited 5×
- IN RE: M.V.H. M.V.H., & IN RE M.V.H. L.H., & IN RE L.F.G. L.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-07-21· cited 3×
- In Re JLDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-05-19
- In Re Petition of WdDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-28
- In Re SMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-12-10
- In Re FWDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-03-17
- In Re JGDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-09-18
- In Re CloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-04-12
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 1,234×
- People ex rel. Kropp v. ShepskyNew York Court of Appeals· 1953-07-14· cited 169×
- In Re MeltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-04· cited 126×
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-21· cited 110×
- Rinker AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-11-16· cited 110×
- Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-29· cited 85×
- In re D.R.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-28· cited 63×
- In re L.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-04· cited 60×
- In Re Baby Boy C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-19· cited 56×
- In re of K.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-11-20· cited 55×
- In re L.L.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-02-09· cited 53×
- In re A.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-06-20· cited 42×
- In re E.H.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-10-01· cited 38×
- In re A.C.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-10· cited 34×
- In re A.W.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-01-24· cited 30×
- Louise Flood Bell v. Gwendolyn Hairston Leonard, Alonzo Bell and Louise Virginia Bell v. Gwendolyn Hairston LeonardD.C. Circuit· 1958-01-09· cited 28×
- In re P.S.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-12-11· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.