In re D.F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding testimony that drug was a prescription drug was insufficient to prove it was a controlled substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Detienne
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-11· cited 4×
• State v. Jack
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-14· cited 3×
• In re B.C.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2015-01-29· cited 3×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• State v. Thompkins
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
• Minnesota v. Murphy
  Supreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
• State v. Goff
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-06-17· cited 484×
• State v. Gumm
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-08-30· cited 466×
• Enrique Ortiz Cervantes v. Bill Walker, Superintendent, Banning Road Camp
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-01-26· cited 177×
• State v. Maupin
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 144×
• United States v. James L. Conley
  Fourth Circuit· 1985-12-18· cited 110×
• State v. Edwards
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-12-07· cited 54×
• Marco Garcia v. Harry K. Singletary Robert Butterworth
  Eleventh Circuit· 1994-02-10· cited 53×
• United States v. George Andrew Scalf
  Tenth Circuit· 1984-01-24· cited 48×
• United States v. Pedro E. Ozuna
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-03-25· cited 31×