In re D.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• treating social worker’s testimony that “taking a special needs child from the family with which the child had bonded would have negative therapeutic implications for the child” as appropriate expert testimony
• SRS social workers competent to testify to effect of domestic violence on children, among other subjects
• SRS social workers competent to testify to effect of domestic violence on children, among other subjects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Samone H.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-02-09· cited 37×
• In re B.M.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-05-03· cited 29×
• In Re BM
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-05-03· cited 1×
• In Re DC
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-04-14

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bubar
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1985-12-06· cited 73×
• In re B.S.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1995-03-31· cited 32×
• O'BRIEN v. Island Corp.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-06-28· cited 27×