In re D.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that under plain-error review, this Court will reverse only in “exceptional cases” where error is “obvious, grave, and serious”
• “In order to effectively raise objection to action by a court, a party must present the issue with specificity and clarity in a manner which gives the court a fair opportunity to rule on it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cate
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1996-08-09· cited 23×
• State v. Sharrow
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2008-03-07· cited 13×
• In re A.S. and K.S., Juveniles
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-07-08· cited 12×
• In re M.P., Juvenile
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2019-09-17· cited 8×
• In re D.G.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2006-07-24· cited 6×
• In re B.A.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-07-18· cited 4×
• In Re DC
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-26
• In Re Z.L., Juvenile
  Vermont Superior Court· 2017-10-27

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In re G.S.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-02-01· cited 68×
• In re J.R.
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-11-03· cited 64×
• Varnum v. Varnum
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-11-30· cited 42×
• State v. Ringler
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-12-29· cited 15×