Supreme Court of Vermont· 2/1/1990
In re G.S.
Citations
- 153 Vt. 651
- 572 A.2d 1350
- 1990 Vt. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that we will affirm the family division’s conclusions where supported by its findings
- failure to raise constitutional attack on standard of proof in trial court precludes review in this Court where Court cannot find that standard of proof had any effect on outcome of case
- failure to raise constitutional attack on standard of proof in trial court precludes review in this Court where Court cannot find that standard of proof had any effect on outcome of case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BlackmerSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-23· cited 57×
- In re K.F.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2004-04-28· cited 48×
- In re D.S., In re M.H.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2014-04-25· cited 40×
- In re D.C.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-26· cited 22×
- In Re KarpinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-05-21· cited 15×
- In re J.M.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-07-17· cited 10×
- In re H.T. & M.L., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2020-01-17· cited 8×
- In Re K.G. & L.G. JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2023-09-08· cited 8×
- In re R.B., O.B. and K.C., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-08-07· cited 7×
- In re A.M. & G.M., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont· 2020-10-16· cited 2×
- In Re GSSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-02-01
- In Re KFSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-04-28
- In Re DCSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-09-26
- In re J.M., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-07-17
- In Re T.L. & T.L., JuvenilesVermont Superior Court· 2019-06-03
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re J.R.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1989-11-03· cited 64×
- State v. RamsaySupreme Court of Vermont· 1985-08-02· cited 44×
- In re A. D.Supreme Court of Vermont· 1983-09-13· cited 33×
- State v. AnderkinSupreme Court of Vermont· 1984-12-07· cited 22×
- Garrow v. GarrowSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-09-30· cited 15×
Other cases named In re G.S.
31 other CourtListener records share this case name.
- In re G.S.Montana Supreme Court· 2002-11-07· cited 45×
- In re G.S.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2009-10-27· cited 17×
- In Re GSConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-10-27· cited 16×
- In re G.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-26· cited 4×
- In re G.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-16· cited 2×
- In re G.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-15· cited 2×
- In Re GsMissouri Court of Appeals· 2006-09-05· cited 1×
- In Re GsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-04-11· cited 1×
- In re G.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-05-05· cited 1×
- In re G.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-23· cited 1×
- In Re GSMontana Supreme Court· 2002-11-07
- In Re GsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-04-25
- In Re GSSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-12-09
- In Re GSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-09-12
- In Re GSSupreme Court of Vermont· 1990-02-01
- In Re GsSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-09-07
- In Re GSAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-02-16
- In Re GsCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2010-03-24
- In Re GsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-07-25
- In Re GsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2010-06-18
- In re G.S.West Virginia Supreme Court· 2021-04-02
- In re G.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-16
- In re G.S.New York Supreme Court· 2007-08-09
- in Re G.S.Texas Supreme Court· 2022-04-22
- in Re G.S.Texas Supreme Court· 2022-04-22
- In re G.S.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2008-05-29
- In re G.S.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-12-09
- In re G.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-03-21
- In re G.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-06-17
- In re G.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-13
- In re G.S.Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2025-10-24
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.