Varnum v. Varnum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing mother’s free exercise of religion claim, even though it was raised for the first time on appeal because “fundamental rights and interests [were] at stake”
• addressing mother's free exercise of religion claim, even though it was raised for the first time on appeal because \fundamental rights and interests [were] at stake\
• “[T]he power granted by Rule 611(a) includes the authority to set reasonable limits on the consumption of time in examining witnesses.”
• post-DeLaBruere case with no analysis, separate and distinct from First Amendment, of Article 3 claim that family court violated mother’s free exercise rights by factoring religious beliefs and practices into child custody determination
• post- DeLaBruere case with no analysis, separate and distinct from First Amendment, of Article 3 claim that family court violated mother's free exercise rights by factoring religious beliefs and practices into child custody determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).