Skip to main content
· 12/2/2015

McM Portfolio LLC v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Citations

  • 812 F.3d 1284
  • 117 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1284
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 20848
  • 2015 WL 7755665

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Governing Supreme Court and Federal Circuit authority require rejection of MCM's argument that inter partes review violates Article III.\
  • finding patentee waived argument where it raised only “a few scattered sentences” at the oral hearing
  • characterizing McCormick’s holding as depending on the lack of “statutory authorization”
  • “Because patent rights are public rights, and their validity susceptible to review by an administrative agency, the Seventh Amendment poses no barrier to agency adjudication without a jury.”
  • grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prost, Dyk, Hughes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.