Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/13/2020

In re C.R.

Citations

2020 Ohio 2970

Syllabus

Juvenile court decision to terminate parental rights and award the agency permanent custody was not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. Ohio law does not require that the agency provide reasonable case plan services for a minimum period of time. Denial of grandfather's motions to intervene and for legal custody were not an abuse of discretion.

Judges: Pietrykowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.
Ohio Supreme Court· 1978-05-24· cited 4,737×
Eastley v. Volkman
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
Karches v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-07-20· cited 477×
In re Schmidt
Ohio Supreme Court· 1986-08-13· cited 122×
State v. Anderson (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-07-05· cited 27×
State ex rel. N.G. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Div. (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-14· cited 25×
In re K.L.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-13· cited 8×
In re N.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-01· cited 6×
In re A.M.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-02-15· cited 4×
In re A.C.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-21· cited 3×
In re J.H.
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-24· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.