Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/15/2018
In re A.M.
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 646
- 105 N.E.3d 389
Syllabus
Permanent custody: manifest weight of the evidence best interests of the child reasonable efforts to reunify the family.
Judges: Hoover
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re Adoption of HolcombOhio Supreme Court· 1985-08-07· cited 1,100×
- In re William S.Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-03-04· cited 811×
- Suter v. Artist M.Supreme Court· 1992-03-25· cited 620×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 583×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In re Estate of HaynesOhio Supreme Court· 1986-07-23· cited 380×
- Dyer v. MacDougallSecond Circuit· 1952-12-31· cited 372×
- State v. LindseyOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 348×
- State v. CowansOhio Supreme Court· 1999-10-20· cited 323×
- In re K.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
- In re Adoption of RidenourOhio Supreme Court· 1991-08-07· cited 216×
- State v. Neyland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-05-08· cited 181×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.