Skip to main content

In re A.C.

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 4788

Syllabus

Legal custody continuance due process extension of temporary custody manifest weight of the evidence preponderance of the evidence best interest of the child. No abuse of discretion in denying Father's motion for continuance where claimed medical emergency was contrived and dilatory. No abuse of discretion in denying Father's motion to extend temporary custody where Father made no effort to complete his case plan, there was no reason to believe that the child could be placed with Father within the next six months, and legal custody was in the child's best interest. No abuse of discretion in denying Father's request to remove assigned case worker where there was no evidence of a genuine conflict.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.