Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/10/1971
State v. Barrett
Citations
- 483 P.2d 1106
- 207 Kan. 178
- 1971 Kan. LEXIS 381
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the work done by secretaries and other lay persons is done as agents of the lawyer employing them and the lawyer must supervise their work and be responsible for their work product or the lack thereof
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-07-23· cited 89×
- State v. CaenenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-04-27· cited 32×
- Matter of BurtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-01-11· cited 32×
- In Re ChoroszejDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-30· cited 31×
- Disciplinary Board of the Hawaii Supreme Court v. KimHawaii Supreme Court· 1978-08-16· cited 24×
- In Re WilkinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-07-10· cited 21×
- In Re the Estate of RichardCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1979-11-09· cited 20×
- State v. HiltonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-07-17· cited 7×
- State v. SchumacherSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-11-04· cited 5×
- In Re FlackSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-10-26· cited 4×
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado· 2003-08-13· cited 3×
- State v. KiesowSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-11-04· cited 2×
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 2001-07-03
- Investment of Municipal FundsPennsylvania Department of Justice· 1974-10-11
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.