Court of Appeals of Texas· 10/2/1996
In re C.C.
Citations
- 930 S.W.2d 929
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the other three findings support the court’s ultimate decision to transfer, any factual insufficiency with regard to the court’s findings on the two challenged factors is irrelevant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carroll, Kidd, Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re C.J.H.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-06-13· cited 148×
- In re J.D.P.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2002-08-22· cited 108×
- In re M.S.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1997-02-27· cited 70×
- In re J.G.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-05-05· cited 34×
- In re H.Y.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-12-06· cited 34×
- In the Matter of E.D.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2004-01-29· cited 24×
- Matter of CCTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-10-02· cited 9×
- Charles Carlson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-03-14· cited 4×
- In Re JDPCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-08-22
- In Re EDTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-01-29
- Matter of MSTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-02-27
- in the Matter of C. R.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-06-26
- in the Matter of M. S.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-02-27
- in the Matter of N. B.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1999-04-15
- in the Matter of C.L.L.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-03-02
- in the Matter of E. D.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2004-01-29
- Santos Almanzar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2012-12-20
- in the Matter of H. Y.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2016-12-06
- in the Matter of Z.T.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2021-08-17
- in the Matter of I. N. A.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2022-10-04
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court· 1965-11-03· cited 3,215×
- Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court· 1989-04-19· cited 1,163×
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. CryeTexas Supreme Court· 1995-06-15· cited 1,065×
- Cornealius v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-05-24· cited 125×
- R_ E_ M v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1976-06-30· cited 45×
- J.P.O., Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1995-04-24· cited 44×
- Cornealius v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-06· cited 38×
- C.C.G. Matter OfCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1991-01-31· cited 37×
- Tatum v. State of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-03-10· cited 35×
- In re I. BCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1981-06-24· cited 34×
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-04-19· cited 19×
- Turner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1990-07-10· cited 18×
- In the Matter of R.A.G.Texas Supreme Court· 1993-11-24· cited 15×
- Joseph v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-10-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.