Skip to main content

In Re Cain

Citations

  • 590 A.2d 291
  • 527 Pa. 260
  • 1991 Pa. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • retired judge who was administratively removed from senior judge status was still subject to disciplinary action
  • \An issue can become moot during the pendency of an appeal due to ... an intervening change in the applicable law.\
  • “It is - 11 - J-S10039-21 a well-established principle of law that this Court will not decide moot questions.”
  • “It is a well-established principle of law that this Court will not decide moot questions.”
  • “An issue can become moot during the pendency of an appeal due to an intervening change in the facts of the case or due to an intervening change in the applicable law[.]”; In re R.D., 44 A.3d 657 (Pa.Super. 2012

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Flaherty, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Larsen, McDermott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re Cain

28 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.