Com., Dep v. Cromwell Tp., Huntingdon Cty.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one of the well- recognized exceptions to the mootness doctrine is “where the conduct complained of is capable of repetition yet likely to evade review”
• noting that a challenge to subject matter jurisdiction “may be raised at any time in the course of the proceedings, including by a reviewing court sua sponte”
• “Allowing these issues to be considered moot on this set of facts and with no analysis from the court leaves the Department emboldened and empowered to continue to engage in such dilatory and improper tactics.”
• “Allowing these issues to be considered moot on this set of facts and with no analysis from the court leaves the Department emboldened and empowered to continue to engage in such dilatory and improper tactics.”
• question of whether a court has jurisdiction may be raised at any time in the course of the proceedings, including by a reviewing court sua sponte
• “The question whether a court has jurisdiction . . . may be raised at any time in the course of the proceedings, including by a reviewing court sua sponte.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).