Customs and Patent Appeals· 5/18/1972
In re Brown
Citations
- 59 C.C.P.A. 1036
- 459 F.2d 531
- 173 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 685
- 1972 CCPA LEXIS 325
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- in product-by-process claims the patentability of the product must be established independent of the process
- “[I]t is the patentability of the product claimed and not of the recited process steps which must be established.”
- in product-by-process claims the patentability of the product must be established independent of the process
- focusing on the product claimed and not the process
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Almond, Baldwin, Lane, Rao, Rich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smithkline Beecham Corp. v. Apotex [Corrected Date]Federal Circuit· 2006-02-24· cited 390×
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-05-18· cited 174×
- Amgen Inc. v. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2009-09-15· cited 136×
- Scripps Clinic & Research Foundation v. Genentech, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1991-03-11· cited 106×
- Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1992-07-13· cited 79×
- In Re William J. KingFederal Circuit· 1986-09-19· cited 62×
- In Re Donald H. ThorpeFederal Circuit· 1985-11-21· cited 45×
- In Re Laszlo Marosi, Joachim Stabenow, and Matthias SchwarzmannFederal Circuit· 1983-06-22· cited 36×
- Struthers Patent Corp. v. Nestle Co., Inc.D. New Jersey· 1981-10-13· cited 22×
- In re BestCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1977-10-13· cited 22×
- In re BaxterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-07-30· cited 22×
- Johnson & Johnson v. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.D. Delaware· 1977-07-28· cited 21×
- Unnamed caseFederal Circuit· 1991-04-30· cited 14×
- In re LuckCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1973-04-26· cited 14×
- In re FessmannCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-01-10· cited 10×
- Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1992-08-14· cited 8×
- In re FitzgeraldCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1980-04-03· cited 4×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.