Application of Lionel Alexander Bethune Pilkington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the product itself must be new
• “[T]he differences between the [claimed product] and the [product] of the prior art do not appear to us to be particularly susceptible to definition by the conventional recitation of properties or structures.”
• “[P]atentability of a claim to a product does not rest merely on a difference in the method by which that product is made. Rather, it is the product itself which must be new and unobvious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).