M.D. Florida· 2/11/1998
In Re Brown
Citations
- 221 B.R. 902
- 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 275
- 40 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 262
- 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 706
- 1998 WL 327664
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although no tape recording of meeting existed, “Trustee either implicitly or explicitly continued the meeting of creditors to an unspecified future date”
- because the adjournment process is based on the trustee’s discretion, “some limitation based on reasonableness should apply.”
- although no tape recording of meeting existed, “Trustee either implicitly or explicitly continued the meeting of creditors to an unspecified future date”
- case-by-case approach allows trustees discretion to perform their duties, but with some limitations based on reasonableness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karen S. Jennemann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Peres v. ShermanFifth Circuit· 2008-06-06· cited 14×
- In Re CherryS.D. Texas· 2006-05-10· cited 14×
- In Re JamesE.D. North Carolina· 2001-03-23· cited 12×
- Moyer v. Dutkiewicz (In Re Dutkiewicz)Sixth Circuit· 2009-07-06· cited 11×
- In Re BaceS.D. New York· 2007-03-19· cited 9×
- Wiscovitch v. Puerto Rico Electric & Power Authority (In re PMC Marketing Corp.)D. Puerto Rico· 2012-10-19· cited 2×
- Logan v. Williams (In Re Williams)D. Maryland· 2008-03-17· cited 1×
- Steffen v. United States (In Re Steffen)M.D. Florida· 2009-04-27· cited 1×
- In Re SteffenM.D. Florida· 2008-04-25
- In re: Joy Dutkiewicz v.Sixth Circuit· 2009-07-06
- Jenkins v. Ward (In re Jenkins)W.D. North Carolina· 2014-03-31
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court· 1992-04-21· cited 949×
- In Re LevittD. Massachusetts· 1992-03-10· cited 39×
- Duffy Petit v. FessendenFirst Circuit· 1996-04-03· cited 36×
- In Re De KleinmanS.D. New York· 1994-09-26· cited 36×
- In Re HavanecN.D. Ohio· 1994-12-22· cited 31×
- In Re FlynnD. Massachusetts· 1996-09-26· cited 27×
- In Re VanceN.D. Oklahoma· 1990-10-04· cited 27×
- Petit v. FessendenD. Maine· 1995-03-10· cited 25×
- In Re DiGregorioN.D. Illinois· 1995-10-11· cited 23×
- Bernard v. Coyne (In re Bernard)Ninth Circuit· 1994-11-21· cited 23×
- LINI, Inc. v. Schachter (In Re Schachter)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1997-11-10· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.