Skip to main content
· 12/22/1994

In Re Havanec

Citations

  • 175 B.R. 920
  • 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 2024
  • 1994 WL 724797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that the rule’s objective of finalizing claimed exemptions within a certain and limited period of time is of limited importance in Chapter 11 reorganizations
  • finding that limiting adjournments to a specific date is \unduly constrictive\
  • \Nothing in the language of the Bankruptcy Code or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure compels the choice of one result or the other.\
  • finding that limiting adjournments to a specific date is “unduly constrictive”
  • finding that limiting adjournments to a specific date is “unduly constrictive”
  • finding that limiting adjournments to a specific date is \unduly constrictive\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: David F. Snow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.