· 12/22/1994
In Re Havanec
Citations
- 175 B.R. 920
- 1994 Bankr. LEXIS 2024
- 1994 WL 724797
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that the rule’s objective of finalizing claimed exemptions within a certain and limited period of time is of limited importance in Chapter 11 reorganizations
- finding that limiting adjournments to a specific date is \unduly constrictive\
- \Nothing in the language of the Bankruptcy Code or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure compels the choice of one result or the other.\
- finding that limiting adjournments to a specific date is “unduly constrictive”
- finding that limiting adjournments to a specific date is “unduly constrictive”
- finding that limiting adjournments to a specific date is \unduly constrictive\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: David F. Snow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.