In Re Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that both civil and criminal contempt findings were warranted
• noting that contempt requires willful conduct
• “The power to punish for contempt is inherent in all courts and is essential to preservation of order in judicial proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Widman v. Widman
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-12-10· cited 74×
• Miller v. Miller
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 73×
• Davis v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 49×
• Floyd v. Floyd
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-06-13· cited 43×
• Durlach v. Durlach
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-05-17· cited 24×
• Brandt Ex Rel. Estate of Brandt v. Gooding
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-04-10· cited 21×
• Browning v. Browning
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-10-17· cited 20×
• In re Diggs
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-03-26· cited 4×
• In Re Brown
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-11-08· cited 2×
• In Re Brown
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-25· cited 2×
• In re an Anonymous Former Probate Judge
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-03-22
• In re Frails
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-06-12

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Curlee v. Howle
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-02-17· cited 57×
• Spartanburg County Department of Social Services v. Padgett
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-08-01· cited 24×
• State v. Bowers
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1978-01-30· cited 15×
• State v. Havelka
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-05-13· cited 9×