Skip to main content
· 5/17/2004

Durlach v. Durlach

Citations

  • 596 S.E.2d 908
  • 359 S.C. 64
  • 2004 S.C. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding due process claim not raised in the family court but raised for the first time on appeal is not preserved for review
  • stating an appellate court should reverse a decision regarding contempt if it is without evidentiary support or the circuit court abused its discretion
  • stating an appellate court should reverse a decision regarding contempt if it is without evidentiary support or the circuit court abused its discretion, and clear and convincing evidence must support a finding of civil contempt
  • “Civil contempt must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.”
  • \Civil contempt must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones, Nicholson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.