· 5/17/2004
Durlach v. Durlach
Citations
- 596 S.E.2d 908
- 359 S.C. 64
- 2004 S.C. LEXIS 113
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding due process claim not raised in the family court but raised for the first time on appeal is not preserved for review
- stating an appellate court should reverse a decision regarding contempt if it is without evidentiary support or the circuit court abused its discretion
- stating an appellate court should reverse a decision regarding contempt if it is without evidentiary support or the circuit court abused its discretion, and clear and convincing evidence must support a finding of civil contempt
- “Civil contempt must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.”
- \Civil contempt must be proved by clear and convincing evidence.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones, Nicholson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.