In re Burns

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A permissible amendment must begin with the proposition that the 9 avowed purpose of the original submission was an attempt to file a proof of claim.
• “The debtors’ plan is 18 not an informal proof of claim. It was designed to serve a very different purpose, was not an 19 attempt at submitting a claim, and does not validate an otherwise untimely claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Matter of Ronald J. Witkowski, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1994-02-14· cited 178×
• International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 969 v. Babcock & Wilcox, D/B/A B & W Construction Company, Inc.
  Tenth Circuit· 1987-08-17· cited 41×
• In re Pajian
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-05-11· cited 32×
• Unnamed case
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-08-03· cited 21×
• In Re Baldridge
  N.D. Indiana· 1999-03-22· cited 21×
• Spokane Lefcu v. Marcella Barker
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-10-27· cited 19×
• In Re Fink
  N.D. Indiana· 2007-03-15· cited 15×
• In Re Brooks
  C.D. Illinois· 2007-06-22· cited 13×
• Randy Netzer v. Office of Lawyer Regulation
  Seventh Circuit· 2017-03-13· cited 8×
• In Re Harris
  N.D. Indiana· 2006-03-24· cited 6×
• In re Hrubec
  N.D. Illinois· 2016-01-27· cited 3×
• In re Heft
  C.D. Illinois· 2017-02-16· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  Seventh Circuit· 1992-07-31· cited 1×