In re Blake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there is nothing improper about allowing a debtor to retain part of a tax refund and that is a standard practice in many jurisdictions
• noting the difference between a debtor retaining a tax refund for over withholding taxes as opposed to a debtor receiving a tax refund based on tax credits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Alonso
  D. Idaho· 2017-05-02· cited 7×
• In re Diaz
  W.D. Texas· 2018-05-14· cited 2×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Hogue
  S.D. Ohio· 1987-10-08· cited 29×
• In Re Koch
  C.D. Illinois· 2003-09-25· cited 22×
• In Re Fish
  S.D. Illinois· 1998-08-27· cited 19×
• In Re Brockhouse
  C.D. Illinois· 1998-05-13· cited 18×
• In Re Royal
  N.D. Illinois· 2008-11-07· cited 17×
• In Re Spraggins
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2008-04-11· cited 12×
• Michael D. Clark v. Stephanie A. Brooks
  Seventh Circuit· 2015-04-23· cited 12×
• In Re Michaud
  D. New Hampshire· 2008-12-30· cited 11×
• In Re Skougard
  D. Utah· 2010-10-27· cited 10×
• In re Vazquez
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-09-08· cited 10×
• In Re Forbish
  N.D. Illinois· 2009-05-05· cited 9×
• In Re Curcio
  N.D. Florida· 2008-04-22· cited 5×
• In re Ramos
  D. Puerto Rico· 2013-06-04· cited 5×
• In re Morales
  N.D. Illinois· 2017-02-27· cited 5×
• In re King
  N.D. Indiana· 2014-03-28· cited 3×
• In re Gibson
  N.D. Illinois· 2017-03-13· cited 3×
• In Re Lynch
  N.D. Iowa· 2009-10-01· cited 2×