In re King

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the percentage approach is of limited use where there are intervening deposits after the exempt funds are deposited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Blake
  N.D. Illinois· 2017-03-16· cited 2×
• in Re Charles Storer, Agent Under a Power of Attorney for Kenneth Cooper McAfee
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2015-10-02

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In the Matter of Richard E. BARKER, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 1985-07-23· cited 135×
• Unnamed case
  First Circuit· 1988-02-09· cited 110×
• In Re Lichtenberger
  C.D. Illinois· 2006-02-01· cited 45×
• United States v. Griffith
  Tenth Circuit· 2009-10-27· cited 41×
• Brosamer v. Mark
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-11-01· cited 41×
• Oxford Organisation, Ltd. v. Peterson (In Re Stotler & Co.)
  N.D. Illinois· 1992-08-19· cited 37×
• Union National Bank v. Finley
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1913-11-21· cited 29×
• Matter of Zumbrun
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-12-29· cited 27×
• Townsel v. Dish Network L.L.C.
  Seventh Circuit· 2012-02-16· cited 24×
• Faurote v. Carr
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1886-10-29· cited 24×
• Anuszkiewicz v. Anuszkiewicz
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1977-02-23· cited 18×
• In Re Vale
  N.D. Indiana· 1989-01-23· cited 13×
• In Re Kuhn
  N.D. Indiana· 2005-03-23· cited 11×
• United States v. McConnell (In Re Flying Boat, Inc.)
  N.D. Texas· 2001-02-02· cited 10×
• South Bend Community School Corp. v. Eggleston
  N.D. Indiana· 1997-11-21· cited 10×
• Stoebner v. Consumers Energy Co. (In Re LGI Energy Solutions, Inc.)
  Eighth Circuit· 2011-12-08· cited 10×
• In re De Vries
  N.D. New York· 1987-06-29· cited 7×
• Appalachian Oil Co. v. Tennessee Education Lottery Corp. (In Re Appalachian Oil Co.)
  E.D. Tennessee· 2012-03-23· cited 2×