In re Vazquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that at least a portion of the CTC is exempt under Illinois law
• finding CTC and ACTC qualify as public assistance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hardy v. Fink (In re Hardy)
  Eighth Circuit· 2015-06-02· cited 9×
• In re Hatch
  S.D. Iowa· 2014-10-03· cited 6×
• In re Farnsworth
  D. Idaho· 2016-10-11· cited 3×
• In re Blake
  N.D. Illinois· 2017-03-16· cited 2×
• Polsky v. Werfel
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2015-02-23· cited 1×
• In re Woodside
  C.D. Illinois· 2015-09-17· cited 1×
• Pepper Hardy v. Richard Fink
  Eighth Circuit· 2015-06-02

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Koch
  C.D. Illinois· 2003-09-25· cited 22×
• In Re Royal
  N.D. Illinois· 2008-11-07· cited 17×
• In re West
  N.D. Illinois· 2014-03-26· cited 15×
• Hardy v. Fink (In re Hardy)
  Eighth Circuit· 2013-12-23· cited 13×
• In re Johnson
  N.D. Illinois· 2012-10-11· cited 6×