In Re Blake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding § 107(c) inapplicable, as no party alleged disclosure would create undue risk of identity theft or other unlawful injury
• debtors lacked standing to raise 4 violations of a pooling and servicing agreement
• debtors lacked standing to raise 4 violations of a pooling and servicing agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Motions Seeking Access to 2019 Statements
  D. Delaware· 2018-03-27· cited 10×
• Ostrander v. Source One Financial Corp. (In re Mollison)
  D. Massachusetts· 2012-01-06· cited 2×
• In re Owens Corning Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2016-11-08· cited 2×
• In re Rivera
  D. Puerto Rico· 2015-01-30· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1978-04-18· cited 4,546×
• Soares v. Brockton Credit Union
  First Circuit· 1997-03-13· cited 304×
• In Re: Laorphus Crawford, Debtor. Jack Ferm v. United States Trustee, in Re: Ibolya Rausch, Debtor. Jack Ferm v. United States Trustee
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-10-07· cited 136×
• Gitto v. Worcester Telegram & Gazette Corp.
  First Circuit· 2005-08-31· cited 119×
• United States v. Antar
  Third Circuit· 1994-10-25· cited 115×
• Curtis v. LaSalle National Bank (In Re Curtis)
  D. Massachusetts· 2005-03-31· cited 27×
• In Re Panek
  D. Massachusetts· 2009-03-05· cited 25×
• In Re Rosa
  D. Massachusetts· 2004-08-11· cited 17×
• In Re Trout
  D. North Dakota· 1989-11-22· cited 7×