In Re: Laorphus Crawford, Debtor. Jack Ferm v. United States Trustee, in Re: Ibolya Rausch, Debtor. Jack Ferm v. United States Trustee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the 23 existence of a constitutionally protected “zone of privacy” is firmly established by 24 the Supreme Court
• noting that the existence of a 28 constitutionally protected “zone of privacy” is firmly established by the Supreme 1 Court
• agreeing that public disclosure of social security numbers may implicate the right to informational privacy in “an era of rampant identity theft”
• explaining that the Supreme Court’s precedents recognize an “individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters”
• finding that public disclosure of non-attorney bankruptcy petition preparer’s social security number, which he was required to provide under 11 U.S.C. § 110(c), did not violate constitutional right to privacy
• “Enhanced risk, in fact, 16 obtains anytime the government requires an individual to deposit identifying 17 information in the public record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).