Skip to main content

In re B.K.

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1820

Syllabus

Parental right permanent custody legal custody best interest of the child. Our review indicates that the juvenile court properly engaged in the two-prong analysis set forth in R.C. 2151.414 and that clear and convincing evidence supports the court's decision granting permanent custody of the children to the agency. While mother moved for legal custody to maternal grandmother, the issue in this case is whether permanent custody should be granted to the agency, not whether legal custody should be granted to maternal grandmother. If permanent custody to the agency is in the children's best interest, legal custody to a relative necessarily is not.

Judges: Sheehan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.