In re B.K.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1820
Syllabus
Parental right permanent custody legal custody best interest of the child. Our review indicates that the juvenile court properly engaged in the two-prong analysis set forth in R.C. 2151.414 and that clear and convincing evidence supports the court's decision granting permanent custody of the children to the agency. While mother moved for legal custody to maternal grandmother, the issue in this case is whether permanent custody should be granted to the agency, not whether legal custody should be granted to maternal grandmother. If permanent custody to the agency is in the children's best interest, legal custody to a relative necessarily is not.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In re K.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re M.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 49×
- In re C.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-07· cited 14×
- In re I.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-09· cited 12×
- In re M.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-15· cited 9×
- In re V.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-04· cited 5×
- In re L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-28· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.