In re D.E.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 654
Syllabus
Permanent custody; neglected; dependent; substance abuse; R.C. 2151.353(A); R.C. 2151.414(E); R.C. 2151.414(E)(11); R.C. 2151.414(D)(1); legal custody; reversible error; plain error; ineffective assistance; cumulative error. Affirmed juvenile court's decision granting permanent custody of the child to the children services agency and terminating mother's parental rights. The juvenile court's decision was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The court engaged in the proper analysis and made the requisite determinations pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(A)(4) and in accordance with R.C. 2151.414(E) and 2151.414(D)(1) and did not err in denying legal custody to a proposed legal custodian. Though many challenges were raised, no reversible error occurred. Mother failed to demonstrate that the juvenile court committed plain error or that her counsel was ineffective. The cumulative-error doctrine was inapplicable.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 1,335×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-13· cited 423×
- State v. McAlpinOhio Supreme Court· 2022-05-12· cited 139×
- In re C.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-20· cited 36×
- In re Y.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-11-27· cited 10×
- In re B.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.