In re B.K.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “plaintiffs complaints are based on the same operative facts and seek overlapping relief that is not distinctly different”
• reconciling statements of the law in Keene and Loveladies by incorporating the phrasing and principles announced in each decision
• reconciling Loveladies and Keene by incorporating the “some overlap” language of Keene, instead of requiring perfectly identical demands for relief
• reconciling statements of the law in Keene and Loveladies by incorporating the phrasing and principles announced in each decision
• describing the “operative facts” as “those facts upon which plaintiffs allegations of breaches of the government’s trust responsibility are based”
• rejecting plaintiffs two arguments contending that the two complaints relied upon different operative facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).